| | You are not authorized to post a reply. |
| | Author | Messages | |
Kepler Sneak
 63 Posts




 | | 12/01/2008 6:34 AM |
| I played Basic/Expert D&D and 1st edition AD&D back in the 80s. I jhave recently begun playing some basic D&D with my 7 yo son. I have never really looked at 3rd edition until recently and I must say that I am surprized at the critism I have heard about 3rd edition. Looking at just the core rules 3rd edition doesn't really look all that much different than previous editions. Yes it is somewhat different but no as much as I expected considering all the old-school hatred of that edition.
3rd edition does add some tactical combat complexity (e.g. AoO and flanking) that earlier editions didn't have, but it seems that those rules can be easily ignored if you don't like them (we definitely ignored plenty of 1st edition rules in the 80s).
IMO 3rd edition streamlines and simplifies many aspects of basic game play that enhances the game. For example,
1) AC is now the number you need to hit someone. Much simpiler then referencing a table or using THAC0 (and no THAC0 isn't that hard -- the 3rd edition system is just better IMO).
2) Unifying things like non-weapon proficiencies and thieves skills into a single system.
3) Streamlining saving throws.
3rd edition also added some new elements to the game that I think improves the game. For example,
1) Feats - Special powers have always been part of 1st edition (e.g. quivering palm) so I don't see what the big deal is about feats. Looking through a list of feats in the core rules I really don't see anything that crazy compared to special abilities in 1st and 2nd editions.
2) Multiclassing - I think the 3rd edition system is simple and makes alot of since. As a DM I may want to limit it somewhat but the system itself is pretty soild IMO.
I can understand continuing to play 1st or 2nd edition if that is what you have been playing for 20 or 30 years and you don't see a reaon to change, but why do hate 3rd edition (if you do)?Â
Disclaimer: I don't want an edition war. I am just curious as to what people find objectionable about 3rd edition. | | | |
| Man of Renown Wraithborne Warlord
 5332 Posts



 The Red Light District
 | | 12/01/2008 7:18 PM |
| | I don't really see anything objectionable about 3e. It will be my game of choice for years to come. | | Eye dun no why youse guys think im not relly a person im jimgang from canada but im moving to cali as soon as i get a master card -Jimgang So, you stand at your grave, Has your soul yet been taken away? So you can't read what's engraved, Is this Heaven or merely Decay? Was there a light, enchantingly bright, A Question, just how did it end? Just let me sift through your calm remains, And tear you away from your skin. -Sumerias Fain. | |
| Cardboard Carnage Skirmisher
 43 Posts



 Montana
 | | 12/01/2008 10:46 PM |
| I played 1e for over a decade, never played 2e though... however, I did move on to 3.x and played for several years, and you are right, there were some nice changes made in 3.x and it was a decent system... it didn't seem to have the same 'feel' as the older D&D I played as a kid, but I attributed that to me being an adult when I played 3.x, however, now that I am getting into 4e, I have the 1e feel again.
I would play a 3.x game if the opportunity came up, but personally I am switching to 4e and continuing to try and completely my 1e collection.
D.
| | --- D-Rock Roberts
| |
| Dordledum Commander
 3463 Posts



 Netherlands
 | | 12/02/2008 1:51 AM |
| 3.x is still my game of choice, but I like 2nd edition AD&D as well.
Best thing which 3rd edition brought was the OGL and SRD though.
D. | | Member of the Bearded Devils Champion of the Huge Spider (WotDQ 46/60), A New Umber Hulk (DoDe 57/60), and the Orog Fighter! | |
| Kepler Sneak
 63 Posts




 | | 12/02/2008 6:10 AM |
| Posted By Cardboard Carnage on 12/01/2008 10:46 PM I played 1e for over a decade, never played 2e though... however, I did move on to 3.x and played for several years, and you are right, there were some nice changes made in 3.x and it was a decent system... it didn't seem to have the same 'feel' as the older D&D I played as a kid, but I attributed that to me being an adult when I played 3.x, however, now that I am getting into 4e, I have the 1e feel again.
I would play a 3.x game if the opportunity came up, but personally I am switching to 4e and continuing to try and completely my 1e collection.
D.
I do get a strong sense of nostalgia when looking through the 1st edition AD&D books. I just bought an almost complete set of 1st edition hardcovers (I think the Dungeoneer's Survival Guide is the only one missing) from someone on Dragonsfoot.org. I look forward to putting them in my library. Maybe I will try a 1st edition game again someday. | | | |
| Man of Renown Wraithborne Warlord
 5332 Posts



 The Red Light District
 | | 12/02/2008 8:47 AM |
| | I keep my sense of nostalgia going by running 1e modules in 3e. The Dungeon Crawl Classics series of 3e modules from Goodman games had a nostalgic feeling to them as well. | | Eye dun no why youse guys think im not relly a person im jimgang from canada but im moving to cali as soon as i get a master card -Jimgang So, you stand at your grave, Has your soul yet been taken away? So you can't read what's engraved, Is this Heaven or merely Decay? Was there a light, enchantingly bright, A Question, just how did it end? Just let me sift through your calm remains, And tear you away from your skin. -Sumerias Fain. | |
| yack Commander
 3321 Posts



 Gatineau Canada
 | | 12/02/2008 9:07 AM |
| I still have my AD&D and 2nd edition books and love them . It had better art because it felt old. I play both 2nd and 3.5 but I prefer 3.5 over the editions. Ac going up and being the number to hit makes more sense. I will also pipe in as a Goodman Games fan! Great stuff. (I'm building a world around it and my fav Dungeon mag adventures for 3.5) | | Champion of the Peryton Vindicated Champion : Pit Fiend, Devourer DW: Duergar Priest RPG Only!!!! The Drumming Drunkn' DM | |
| The Great Choco Monster Ghendar Warlord
 13115 Posts



 Mud Lick, Kentucky
 | | 12/02/2008 9:18 AM |
| The only major issue I have with 3e is that DM prep time can be daunting. Creating stat blocks for higher level NPCs takes some time and can take a very long time in some cases. Unlike many of those who came to really dislike 3e, I have no other issues with the system. However, I will concede that it's a system that is easier to play then DM. That's something of a generalization, but I believe it to be mostly true. | | WotC - making me wish more and more every day for a return to the TSR days. :( I fought the snark and the snark won. I'm baaaaaaaaaaack!
Some of my favorite Maxminis quotes I actually love to be swallowed. - Posted By gss_000 on 09/04/2007 2:32 PM Could somebody explain Snatch to me? I understand the basics, but not how to enter/use it. - Posted by orcmonk220 G's the man. - Posted By greyhaze on 11/11/2008 8:58 AM I dont mind butting heads every once in a while. It makes thing interesting. Thats why I'd be heartbroken if Ghendar ever left - Posted By Count Dooku on 04/03/2006 11:58 AM
| |
| Man of Renown Wraithborne Warlord
 5332 Posts



 The Red Light District
 | | 12/02/2008 9:37 AM |
| | I agree that it's easier to play than DM for sure. I tend to cut as many corners as I can on higher level NPCs and give only as much detail as necessary, but it can still take a bit. | | Eye dun no why youse guys think im not relly a person im jimgang from canada but im moving to cali as soon as i get a master card -Jimgang So, you stand at your grave, Has your soul yet been taken away? So you can't read what's engraved, Is this Heaven or merely Decay? Was there a light, enchantingly bright, A Question, just how did it end? Just let me sift through your calm remains, And tear you away from your skin. -Sumerias Fain. | |
| Kepler Sneak
 63 Posts




 | | 12/02/2008 11:09 AM |
| Posted By Wraithborne on 12/02/2008 8:47 AM I keep my sense of nostalgia going by running 1e modules in 3e. The Dungeon Crawl Classics series of 3e modules from Goodman games had a nostalgic feeling to them as well.
I was thinking of running U1 (The Sinister Secret of Salt Marsh) using 3.5 rules for my son and nephews over Christmas break. That is one of my all-time favorite modules. I have heard of the DCC and will check them out. | | | |
| Beware of Kobold Sneak
 89 Posts



 | | 12/02/2008 12:41 PM |
| if you asked me, the only thing wrong with 3.5 is that certain classes *cough*cough*druidcleric*cough* can very easily be made into combat gods, and that high level games can become very complicated. Aside from these though there is nothing wrong with 3.5, as far as I am concerned. I consider it the superior version of D&D available.
The only people criticizing it are the ones trying to sell you 4th edition. | | | |
| Duke of Spoils greyhaze Warlord
 7737 Posts




 | | 12/02/2008 2:18 PM |
| | I do find certain things about 3.5 clumsy and tedious, but it's my RPG edition on choice (just after Star Wars Saga Edition). | | Greyhaze's DDM Spoilers Champion of a Medium Dog & then a Darkenbeast , Raistlin Majere, Nightmare WDQ25/60, Warduke WD60/60, Anti-Champion of Guns, "Knight of Bugbears", and Joke Champion of Venger. Called Shots: Frost Giant in Dangerous Delves. | |
| Shottglazz Underboss
 1184 Posts



 Quinte West, Ontario, Canada
 | | 12/03/2008 6:51 AM |
| Posted By Kepler on 12/02/2008 11:09 AM Posted By Wraithborne on 12/02/2008 8:47 AM I keep my sense of nostalgia going by running 1e modules in 3e. The Dungeon Crawl Classics series of 3e modules from Goodman games had a nostalgic feeling to them as well. I was thinking of running U1 (The Sinister Secret of Salt Marsh) using 3.5 rules for my son and nephews over Christmas break. That is one of my all-time favorite modules. I have heard of the DCC and will check them out. Kepler, I have 3.5 conversions to the Saltmarsh series if yer interested - can email em to ye...
| | Shottglazz "Take my love, take my land, take me where I cannot stand; I don't care, I'm still free, you can't take the sky from me." Completed trades ( 53 ): Pikel, Darrell x2, JeffDHarvey, BiggPappa001, Ghendar, Valinrook X2, Wolfgang x4, Wraithborne x6, Mr Ruffles, Anothermullen, CKissee x3, Browns_Scoundrel, Kyrin, GuJiaXian x2, Tyngfumv, Basic_Aim, Mickey Mouse, Berus316, Crisisman, Zoons, Rockfrd, Sterling40 x2, Brucemc, 2007 Magical Mystery Trade, Redskullz x2, Stephengroy, Lyus_Sleyden, Foolforthought, 2008 Magical Mystery Trade, Kilsek x4, Generic Fighter, Auric, Relientkitten x3 Pending trades ( 0 ): WotC trades ( 1 ): Red_Deceiver Bad trades ( 2 ): LeftEyeofGruumsh, Yotebeth | |
| Knight of Argenis Corim Danex Warlord
 6844 Posts



 West Valley City, Utah
 | | 12/19/2008 2:27 PM |
| My complaints are about 4e, not 3.5. I play 3.5 and not 3.0. 3.0 came out incompletely playtested because Hasbro forced them to publish by a certain date and told them they could complete playtesting and release 3.5 later.
Yes, there are a few things that I don't like about 3.5, but overall I love it and plan to stick with it indefinitely. The only thing I can see swapping it for is a homebrewed version that improved things I felt were lacking. Not really expecting to take the time to do that though. Too bad Pathfinder is munchkinized. | | "Look to God and live." Alma 37:47 Vindicated Champ of Hippogriff (Arcadian Hippogriff) and Uncommon Horse | |
|
| | You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
| |
ActiveForums 3.7 | You must be signed in to participate in the
games. |